| more navel gazing...oooh fluff! |
[Jul. 13th, 2008|10:52 pm] |
Below are the results according to Regressive Imagery Analysis of what I have written in my LiveJournal over the last 4 years. RIA is a plug-in for LJ-archive which analyses the frequency of word usage and the implied psychological interpretation
Now, let's think about this. It's not just me who writes my LiveJournal! Cut and Paste my dears! There are links to other people's text and also statements or expressions written on the Internet by people trained to promote websites. There is also the internet language itself.
Having looked at some other "people" 's personal results posted online, there IS a varying degree of difference. This could defeat any idea I had that I was being misinterpreted as some coalescence of Internet expression.
Moral Imperative is secondary thinking. Positive affect and Anxiety are Emotions.
"Unknown" is Regressive Cognition in Primary thinking. "Depth" is Icarian Imagery in Primary thinking. "Glory" is Emotional thinking.
Primary process thinking
- Primordial thought - the type of thinking found in fantasy and reverie - described by Freud as the "id". This kind of thought is associative, free-form, and takes little account of reality.
Secondary process thinking
Conceptual thought - abstract, logical, reality oriented, and aimed at problem solving. In Freudian terms, this is the domain of the "ego".
I think we all know what this one is about. Or do we?
I think what it is telling me is that I have an interest in heroic ordering of social expression through getting deep down beneath the secret, strange and unknown. As my secondary (conceptual, constructive) thinking is below average, I am either not very practical about it or I prefer not to talk about it.
As I said to a friend, I like to jump into a scene, stir it up subtly and watch the action. Sometimes even a non-contributing presence can induce this. I am then very likely to go home and positively bitch about it. The pearl is an irritation of the oyster. |
|
|
| Comments: |
>> I have an interest in heroic ordering of social expression through getting deep down beneath the secret, strange and unknown. As my secondary (conceptual, constructive) thinking is below average, I am either not very practical about it or I prefer not to talk about it.<<
What does Linda Goodman say? ... something about the Aquarian deconstructing a rainbow and still believing in it's mystery ... ?
Seems to me that you are most practical ... and why should you talk about what you know to be true? It just is. This is something important you have taught me ... when to be quiet.
Even though ... it doesn't always take. ;o] | |
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}